Messages

I would love to sign up if it's not too late!

Derg17 - tracer 3.5-1.5

#7666162
#7666653
#7667406
#7668311
#7668899

Derg17 4 - Tathibel  2

#7443882
#7444661
#7444931
#7445469
#7445873
#7446332

In

Oh totally! Thanks Rabid! So this is not a bug.

I was possessing my opponent and I played Wild Hunt. I chose estate and points, it gave neither player the points (should have given me 3 points)
Here is the game log: Joining game #5745573 on frankfurt.

Oh great! No problem, it didn't affect the game at all, I just wanted to let you know. Thanks for fixing it! I continue to enjoy Shuffleit Dominion, thanks for all your work Stef!

In game Joining game #4625623 on oregon.

I swindled my opponent's 5 cost card and had them gain an Inn. But it did not allow my opponent to pick action cards to shuffle into their deck but acted like I was doing it, and I had a button to click that said "done selecting" or something like that. The same thing happened to my opponent in the same game when they had me gain an Inn.

This came from Joining game #46741 on tokyo.

The masquerade text repeats: "next such such player"

Thanks again for your work! Great to hear there will be leaderboards!

I'm not sure what it will feel like to have a leaderboard as a number from 1-100... But I would say that I think it is critical for someone to be able to see clear feedback on how their playing is effecting their rank. (Maybe it doesn't pop up in their face after every game. But after a game I think they should be able to check and see where they now stand in the rankings if they want.) And this should be true for someone who is ranked low, middle and high. With lack of a clear way to see where they stand and an ability to check their progress, I worry people will lack motivation. Even my friends who are lower on the board report back to me when they move up a bit.

It's just a reality that people are highly motivated by rankings. It seems that this motivation should be leveraged in the most clear way possible. Maybe that will work great in what you have in mind! I was worried what you have described would obscure rather than illuminate someone's ranking/standing.

Seems similar to his problem of trashing provinces. On turn 26 of Joining game #2568 on frankfurt-test2, Lord Rattington returned two provinces with his ambassador. To be fair, he might have just been frustrated by the score...

[Silk Road: shows value of individual VPGardens: shows value of individual VP]

I noticed some inconsistencies with how Alt VP displays under the "VP" column in the post game chart. For some cards it displays total VP and for a couple it displays the value each individual card of that type reached. To be consistent in the graph they should all display total VP. (if you want to display value each card is worth maybe put it in the description?)

Here's what I found:
Fairgounds: shows total VP
Duke: shows total VP
Silk Road: shows value of individual VP
Gardens: shows value of individual VP
Vinyard: shos total VP
Feodum: shows total VP

I think then Silk Roads and Gardens need to be switched to show total VP. I Attached a picture of Silk Road and Gardens doing this.
I think this pic is from Joining game #1565 on frankfurt-test2.

This was the game: Joining game #1276 on frankfurt-test2.

Unless I'm confused... it is listing the second card I draw off the hunting party as one of the cards revealed before drawing. See picture.

2p is lining up wrong. (At least for me on chrome). Attached picture.