I am not sure if this is technically a bug or not. When I use the Tables tab to look at the games, it only shows new and post-game for the two player tables, no games appear as running. For 3+ player games, new, running and post-game tables all show up. Been like this for a couple of days, if I want to spectate on a game, there are none shown as running.
Thanks, KK
Thanks for reporting this problem, Kevin!
However, could you post screenshots of those 2 cases?
For me, it currently looks like in the file attached. If I click on the option to "Show running games", it does so, both for 2 and 3 player games.
Here is what mine shows. 3-player shows running games. I scrolled to the bottom of the 2-player which is where normally the running games are shown. This shows only post-game, there was one new one at the top.
Thanks, Kevin
Here is the 3-player.
KK
Hallo Kevin,
the behavior is a mixture of unmentioned limitations (1) and undiscoverable UI (2,3):
1) The list in "Tables" will only show a maximum of 50 tables.
2) The selection is done by ordering according to one of the four column headers: "Host", "Players", "Spectators" and "Status"
3) You can select according to which column is ordered by clicking on the column header (click again for a reverse order).
For example, if you click on "Host", you get the alphabetically first 50 entries, which at the moment starts with "9..." and goes to "e...". If I click on "Host" again, I get games hosted by "Y..." to "S...".
The default column seems to be "Status", where the order is "New" then "Post-game" and finally "Running". For 2-player games (the vast majority), there are more than 50 games in the "New" and "Post-game" state, so they're the only ones you see. For 3+ player games (far less, 25 at the moment) there normally are less than 50 in "New" and "Post-game" state, so you see some as running.
If you want to see some (proabably not all) 2 player running games, just click on "Status", and the order will be reversed, now with "Running" at the top (and possibly the only entry).
Thanks for the reply, that makes sense, I didn't know that it was sortable by header, is this in the documentation anywhere?
Thanks again, Kevin
I don't think this has been mentioned. I'll try to think of something to make it easier to discover when you are on the page.